I feel like you've failed to actually prove the most important issue: Has the magazine's quality, specifically of its writing and the richness of its factual reporting, actually gone down? Had it been going down before the 2015 for-profit partnership? Are you able to prove/measure that it went down after that? Now that the writers are all freelancers or editors doing the writing, has it gone down? These are the most important questions; I was hoping to get insight from your article to these, but didn't.