I would rather have to deal with a wet bulb temperature that's too high than freezing temperatures, which are equivalent in their overall effect. For every increase in too high wet bulb temperature, there is a corresponding decrease in freezing temperatures elsewhere in the world. Climate change has been happening naturally for billions of years. Without human effects, the IPCC has determined that global temperatures would be declining. I would rather temperatures increase than decrease. We should reduce human effects to make temperatures increase far more slowly, but still, it's preferable to have some human influence rather than none because none would mean going back into an ice age