Overusing whataboutism accusations like you're doing is a terrible argument. Whataboutism is when someone diverts the topic to something irrelevant. You are in effect saying that it's irrelevant to fully compare the whole lifecycle pollution costs of all energy sources (renewable, batteries, nuclear, etc.), which is a terrible argument. You are in effect saying it's irrelevant to compare the pollution effects of renewables and their batteries to the pollution effects of nuclear, which makes no sense at all; that is the exact sort of comparison that humanity's survival depends upon. You are making the terrible argument.