You said " In the example, the facilitator is forcing the content as facilitator, by either supporting or refuting objections raised. That’s not the facilitator's job. " - Yes I mentioned that the Facilitator along with anyone else could address the substance of objections (which is a lot like how the official sociocracy rules explicitly empower the Facilitator to suggest a particular person as the seeming best candidate for a position); however, imagine your suggested situation. Someone else, not the Facilitator suggests moving on because someone else's objection either isn't well-reasoned or doesn't impinge on that person's core duties - The Facilitator then has the choice of suggesting to continue to discuss the issue (indirectly supporting the idea that the objection might be valid), or going along with the suggestion and just moving the topic of conversation to something else. This is a form of power.